Culturally Responsive EMDR for Addiction Treatment

The integration of EMDR and Substance Use treatment cannot be separated from cultural and systemic realities. Research consistently demonstrates that racial and ethnic minorities in the United States face disparities in access, engagement, and outcomes for substance use disorder treatment (Jordan et al., 2022; Saloner & Le Cook, 2013; Guerrero et al., 2013, 2017).

For clinicians developing an EMDR Master Treatment Plan, Phase 1 History Taking and Treatment Planning must account not only for individual trauma and addiction history, but also for systemic inequities and cultural context. In this blog, we’ll explore how disparities affect treatment, why culturally adapted EMDR matters, and how Addiction Focused EMDR can be aligned with equity in care.

Understanding Disparities in Substance Use Treatment

Jordan et al. (2022) found that Black and Latinx clients are significantly less likely to receive evidence-based treatment, including MAT (Medication-Assisted Treatment) or residential care, even when controlling for severity. Instead, they are more likely to enter treatment through the criminal legal system, leading to more coercive care experiences and reduced engagement.

Saloner & Le Cook (2013) and Saloner, Carson, & Le Cook (2014) further showed that completion rates for treatment are consistently lower among Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Indigenous clients, even after adjusting for income and insurance. Besse et al. (2021) noted that even when peer recovery support was provided in emergency departments, disparities in linkage to treatment persisted.

These findings highlight that EMDR and Addiction treatment planning cannot be one-size-fits-all. A Phase 1 plan that overlooks systemic inequities risks retraumatizing clients or reinforcing barriers rather than dismantling them.

Why Cultural Adaptation Matters in EMDR

Bannink et al. (2021) demonstrated how cultural adaptations of the standard EMDR protocol in African countries increased treatment effectiveness by honoring cultural values, beliefs, and community context. Similarly, Huey & Polo (2017) found that culturally adapted interventions led to better outcomes for ethnic minority youth, particularly when interventions incorporated cultural identity and language.

In Addiction Focused EMDR, cultural adaptations may include:

• Incorporating culturally relevant resources in Phase 2 resourcing.

• Attending to intergenerational trauma during EMDR Target Selection.

• Sequencing targets to reflect not only traumatic events but systemic stressors (e.g., discrimination, inequity).

• Collaborating with clients on how to frame treatment goals in ways that honor their cultural worldview.

This is EMDR and Addiction Treatment Planning as social justice practice — where Phase 1 becomes a place of acknowledgment and respect rather than erasure.

Take this APA Approved CE Course: Applying EMDR to Substance Abuse Treatment

Integrating EMDR History Taking with Equity Awareness

When conducting EMDR History Taking in Phase 1 with clients from marginalized backgrounds, clinicians should intentionally explore both individual and systemic factors shaping the addiction narrative. This may include:

• Access to medical and mental health services across the lifespan.

• Cultural stigma related to addiction or mental health treatment.

• Family history of substance use, trauma, or systemic oppression.

• Immigration, displacement, or community-level trauma.

• Encounters with the criminal justice system that shape help-seeking.

Guerrero et al. (2017) found that programs implementing evidence-based treatment strategies within culturally sensitive frameworks reduced disparities in SUD outcomes. For EMDR and Substance Use work, this means embedding readiness assessments, EMDR Target Selection, and EMDR Target Sequencing within a lens that accounts for inequity.

Addiction Focused EMDR and Cultural Responsiveness

In practice, Addiction Focused EMDR interventions can be adjusted to align with cultural responsiveness:

• DeTUR protocol (Popky, 2005): Instead of framing triggers solely as “craving cues,” clinicians may work with clients to identify triggers linked to racial trauma, microaggressions, or systemic stressors.

• FSAP (Miller, 2012, 2016): The feeling states attached to substance use may be tied to cultural identity — for example, “drinking makes me feel I belong.” EMDR Target Sequencing should prioritize these feeder memories.

• CravEx (Hase, 2009; Hase et al., 2008): In targeting relapse episodes, clinicians should explore systemic contributors (e.g., unstable housing, inequitable access to care).

This doesn’t change the structure of protocols — it changes the frame, the meaning, and the therapeutic stance. By placing EMDR within a cultural context, clinicians can reduce the risk of alienation and dropout.

 Explore Addiction Focused EMDR Protocols in Our CE Course

Practical Strategies for Equity in EMDR Treatment Planning

To integrate cultural and systemic considerations into EMDR Master Treatment Plans, clinicians can:

1. Use validated assessments that capture cultural context. For example, the Addiction Severity Index can be paired with culturally adapted intake questions.

2. Collaborate on goal setting. Instead of imposing abstinence as the only “successful” outcome, align EMDR Target Selection with the client’s goals — abstinence, harm reduction, or both.

3. Acknowledge systemic barriers in treatment notes and plans. This documentation not only supports ethical care but may also influence insurance approvals.

4. Create sequencing strategies that reflect resilience. In addition to trauma targets, install positive cultural identity experiences to support grounding.

5. Consult with cultural brokers. Community leaders or bilingual therapists can support adaptations during EMDR Phase 1 planning.

By embedding these strategies, EMDR and Addiction Treatment Planning becomes more than symptom reduction — it becomes a pathway to empowerment.

Conclusion

Cultural and systemic disparities shape every aspect of substance use treatment. When EMDR and Substance Use interventions are integrated without attention to culture, clients may disengage, relapse, or experience re-traumatization. However, when Addiction Focused EMDR is applied with cultural responsiveness, it can strengthen treatment engagement, reduce disparities, and build more effective EMDR Master Treatment Plans.

As clinicians, Phase 1 History Taking and Treatment Planning is where this begins. Our work is not only to map trauma and cravings but also to understand how systemic barriers intersect with healing. By weaving equity into EMDR Target Selection, EMDR Target Sequencing, and treatment planning, we can make EMDR and Addiction a tool for recovery that respects and empowers every client.

 Register Now for the EMDR and Addiction Treatment Planning CE Course

References

1. Bannink, F., Mbazzi, K., Dewailly, A., Admasu, K., Duagani, Y., Wamala, K., Vera, A., Bwesigye, D., & Roth, G. (2021). Cultural adaptations of the standard EMDR protocol in five African countries. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 15(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1891/EMDR-D-20-00028

2. Besse, M., Castillo, E., Perera, K., Collazo, R., Rosenthal, M., & Samuels, E. (2021). Peer recovery specialists in emergency departments: A retrospective cohort study examining racial disparities in linkage to treatment. Substance Abuse, 42(4), 1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1940367

3. Guerrero, E. G., Marsh, J. C., Duan, L., Oh, C., & Perron, B. (2013). Disparities in completion of substance abuse treatment among racial and ethnic groups in Los Angeles County, 2006–2009. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.007

4. Guerrero, E. G., Garner, B. R., Cook, B., & Kong, Y. (2017). Does implementation of evidence-based substance use disorder treatment reduce racial/ethnic disparities? A study of addiction health services in Los Angeles County. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 75, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.007

5. Huey, S. J., Jr., & Polo, A. J. (2017). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for ethnic minority youth. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1247358

6. Jordan, A., Mathis, M. L., Isang, B., Koroma, M. A., & Volkow, N. D. (2022). Racial and ethnic differences in alcohol, cannabis, and illicit substance use treatment: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of studies done in the USA. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(8), 660–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00160-9

7. Saloner, B., & Le Cook, B. (2013). Blacks and Hispanics are less likely than whites to complete addiction treatment, largely due to socioeconomic factors. Health Affairs, 32(8), 1353–1361. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0316

8. Saloner, B., Carson, N., & Le Cook, B. (2014). Explaining racial/ethnic differences in adolescent substance abuse treatment completion in the United States: A decomposition analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(5), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.002